Penalized present value
PPV is best understood by comparison to two other approaches where a penalty is applied for risk:
- The risk-adjusted rate of return applies a risk-penalty by increasing the discount rate when calculating the Net Present Value (NPV);
- The certainty equivalent approach does this by adjusting the cash-flow numerators of the NPV formula (see Valuation using discounted cash flows #Basic formula for firm valuation using DCF model).
The PPV has many versions, a particularly pragmatic one can be reached by assuming (a) we know the maximum or most optimistic NPV, (b) the minimum or most pessimistic one, (c) these NPVs are approximately normally distributed, and may be calculated via the risk-free rate. Under these approximations, we then have: and . Then, assuming a reasonable t of 1.5:
Therefore, given that we are risk-averse, we weight more the worst case than the most favorable one. Obviously other weights could be applied. According to this criterion, the decision maker will look for investments with positive PPVs, and if a choice is needed, he or she will choose the investment with the highest PPV.
- Gómez-Bezares, F. (1993): "Penalized present value: net present value penalization with normal and beta distributions", in Aggarwal, ed., Capital budgeting under uncertainty, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pages 91–102.
- Gómez-Bezares, F. and F.R. Gómez-Bezares (2013): “An analysis of risk treatment in the field of finance”, in C.-F. Lee & A.C. Lee, eds., Encyclopedia of finance, Springer, New York, 2ª ed., pages 705-711.